Case Study 1: The Enunciative Derivation of La Leche League

Foucault’s approach to the archaeological study of discourse, particularly the “tree of enunciative derivation,” described in his text The Archaeology of Knowledge, is a very useful concept for exploring the way in which networked organizations develop and how each node in the organizational network functions within the larger frame of the network. To explore the way in which Foucault’s theory can be applied to a large networked organization, I have chosen to examine La Leche League, an international organization dedicated to supporting breastfeeding mothers and to promoting understanding of breastfeeding. La Leche League was officially formed in 1958 by a group of nursing mothers in Illinois, and has now grown to an international organization of “mother-to-mother” breastfeeding support and advocacy groups. The organization has a board of directors, an Executive Director, and an Associate Director. Countries with a La Leche League presence have their own national chapters of La Leche League. (The US umbrella organization is called La Leche League USA.) The USA organization is further broken down into state or regional groups. These groups are further divided into either individual meeting groups (in cities with one La Leche League group), or in large cities they may be divided into a city-wide group that is further divided into several individual groups. At the local level, La Leche League meetings are headed by a certified La Leche League Group Leader. While the primary goal of La Leche League is to provide support for breastfeeding mothers and advocate for breastfeeding in the local La Leche League meetings, the organization also has other ways of meeting these goals, such as the Peer Counseling program where non-certified La Leche League members counsel others who are nursing. The organization also hosts conferences and other educationally focused meetings.

Map of International La Leche League Groups.

Map of International La Leche League Groups.

If we were to view the organization as a network, the central node in the group would be the central organization, which has a “core philosophy” composed of 10 separate statements. Other nodes (listed in order of their distance from the central node) include national umbrella groups, regional groups, individual groups, the group leaders, and individual group members. Foucault’s concept of the “tree of enunciative derivation” includes statements at all levels. According to Foucault, the statement has no criteria for unity, and it is not a unit; instead, it is a “function that cuts across a domain of structures and possible unities and reveals them with concrete contents, in time and space” (87). By looking at the dispersion of statements through the network of La Leche League, I hope to uncover evidence about the way in which statements that seem abstract at the base level of the tree of enunciative derivation are put into action and revealed in the “concrete contents” and “time and space” (87) of the local Le Leche League meeting.

At the base level of the tree of enunciative derivation, “are the statements that put into operation rules of formation in their most extended form” (147). The core mission of La Leche League, the rules of the organization that are meant to govern its activity at all levels, are include it the 10 statement philosophy:
• Mothering through breastfeeding is the most natural and effective way of understanding and satisfying the needs of the baby.
• Mother and baby need to be together early and often to establish a satisfying relationship and an adequate milk supply.
• In the early years the baby has an intense need to be with his mother which is as basic as his need for food.
• Breast milk is the superior infant food.
• For the healthy, full-term baby, breast milk is the only food necessary until the baby shows signs of needing solids, about the middle of the first year after birth.
• Ideally the breastfeeding relationship will continue until the baby outgrows the need.
• Alert and active participation by the mother in childbirth is a help in getting breastfeeding off to a good start.
• Breastfeeding is enhanced and the nursing couple sustained by the loving support, help, and companionship of the baby’s father. A father’s unique relationship with his baby is an important element in the child’s development from early infancy.
• Good nutrition means eating a well-balanced and varied diet of foods in as close to their natural state as possible.
• From infancy on, children need loving guidance which reflects acceptance of their capabilities and sensitivity to their feelings. (La Leche League)

The central node of the organization, the base of the tree of enunciative formation, is a guiding philosophy, but until these statements are acted upon by the node branching from the central node, they remain merely untested, undescribed statements. La Leche League’s philosophy , as the root of the network, are the governing statements “that concern the definition of observable structures and the field of possible objects, those that prescribe the forms of description and the perceptual codes that it can use, those that reveal the most general possibilities of characterization, and thus open up a whole domain of concepts to be structures, and those that, while constituting a strategic choice, leave room for the greatest number of subsequent options” (147). La Leche League may have broad rules guiding the general workings of a meeting, and group leaders may be expected to behave in certain ways, share certain types of materials, and provide certain types of support to nursing mothers, but the central organization is not directly involved in these acts. It seems then, that agency is most strongly associated with the nursing mother. The mother and her child are the subjects of most of the statements guiding the organization. Foucault says that “the subject of the statement is also the subject of the operation” and that a proposition can be called a statement if “the position of the subject can be assigned” (95). While other nodes in the network have some agency (such as in the case of the group leader, who can report back to the organization, which may in turn act on the leader’s information), the primary agency belongs to the mother. It is the activity of the mother, along with her child, that is the subject, and it is only the mother who can see that the true goals of the organization are meet (or at least attempted to be met).

It is in the individual meetings, often several nodes removed from the originating node of the central administration of the organization, that the true significance of the governing statements is made evident. It is here that nursing mothers come, looking for real answers to real problems with nursing. Here, at the local meeting, the interaction between network nodes is much more specific. The nursing mother, the far summit of the network, comes to the group leader seeking information. The group leader shares information based on the basic philosophies of the organization, but much more specific in nature (such as proper latch techniques and information about using a SNS (supplemental nursing system). The mother may report back that the techniques have not worked for her, and the group leader may suggest alternative solutions. This specificity of the local meeting reflects what Foucault says about the far reaching branches of the tree of enunciative derivation. He says, “at the end of the branches, or at various places in the whole, a burgeoning of ‘discoveries’ (like that of fossil series), conceptual transformations (like the new definition of the genus), the emergence of new notions (like that of mammals or organisms, technical improvements (principles for organizing collections, methods of classification, and nomenclature)” (147). It is at the local group level that the need for new interpretations or articulations of statements is made evident. The necessity for specific transformations or understandings of core statements becomes evident, and the group leaders may report these transformations back to the central organization, which may then develop a new statement giving suggestions for how group leaders may want to address specific issues that could possibly arise. This seems to have been the case when, in 1987, La Leche League published an article called “Guidelines for Helping Employed Mothers Breastfeed” in Leaven, La Leche League’s quarterly journal. Accoding to a note on the website, “These guidelines for holding a special meeting for employed breastfeeding women are the culmination of a 1986 Pilot Study conducted in Colorado and Wyoming. It was developed by Alice Edwards, Regional Administrator of the Mountain Region” (La Leche League). It seems that the need for strategies to helping employed mothers was noticed at the local level, and a regional administrator attempted to pilot specific strategies to do so, then reported back to the organization, which disseminated the information for other group leaders.

Map of La Leche League Network. The orginzation serves as the base and includes 10 key statements of philosophy, which guide activities at other levels. Each level further from the base interprets the statements with increasing specificity. The nodes at the summit report back and inform the future of the organization.

Map of La Leche League Network. The orginzation serves as the base and includes 10 key statements of philosophy, which guide activities at other levels. Each level further from the base interprets the statements with increasing specificity. The nodes at the summit report back and inform the future of the organization.

While at the organizational level, there is a network of leadership, the base of the organization is the statements that guide the organization. It seems likely that, if the organization were to transform, it would do so at the local level first before it does at the organizational level because it seems to be at the local level hat “the appearances of objects, types of enunciation, concepts, strategic choices, (or transformations that affect those that already exist)” occur at the local (or regional levels)—the branching from the tree. Foucault says that archaeology shows that events (like individual meetings or conversations between group leaders and mothers may transform statements by being presented, becoming an object for discourse, being recorded, “described, explained, elaborated into concepts, and provide the opportunity for a theoretical choice” (167). So what happens at the summit may inform the base organization. This is why I believe that if the network dissolves, it will do so first at the local level. The unique moments of the network may pass away, and groups may stop meeting. Eventually, if the meetings are discontinued, then what remains? I suppose it would be the base of the tree of enunciative derivation, those statements that guide the organization, as well as new statements that have been introduced into the discourse through the activity of the organization.

Foucault’s tree of enunciative derivation was very useful for examining the network of La Leche League, but one thing that I think that I would like to explore further that I do not see a way into with Foucault’s theory is genre theory’s focus on action and the way in which action is guided by meaning, by perception, and not by material (Miller 156). I also would be very interested in exploring Bazerman’s claim about the three levels of analysis of a speech act: the literal statement, the intended act, the actual effect (Bazerman 315).

Works Cited

Foucault, Michel, Alan Sheridan, and Michel Foucault. The Archaeology of Knowledge. New York: Pantheon Books, 1972. Print.

“LLLI Philosophy.” La Leche League. N. p., n.d. Web. 18 Feb. 2014.

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “Case Study 1: The Enunciative Derivation of La Leche League

  1. Hi, Jenny!
    Thanks for the opportunity to read your post! I’m going to leave comments here as I read through, so you will see my process.
    First of all, thank you for a clear opening and a quick contextualization and summary of La Leche League. I am curious about how you will incorporate the “other” functions of La Leche into your main discussion of the organization. Initially, I can see the concept of the network and the tree of enunciative function as being an apt metaphor, particularly if you focus on the organization’s mission as unfolding via statements (both as managed by the organization as a brand, enforced as brand management, and interpreted and repeated, with greater degrees of protocol specifications, as they gain greater distance from the international organization.

    Graphics help to clarify your discussion. Thanks.

    Your thesis: “By looking at the dispersion of statements through the network of La Leche League, I hope to uncover evidence about the way in which statements that seem abstract at the base level of the tree of enunciative derivation are put into action and revealed in the “concrete contents” and “time and space” (87) of the local Le Leche League meeting.” — it is clear, but I am wondering why you stop at the local level, looking at local statements and how they constitute the local meeting, vs. looking at how the organizational statements (the 10 principles) are translated and/or reconstituted at the local level. I’m also curious if you will posit how the information moves both down the tree and up the tree; in other words, is the information designed to originate at the org’s office and be implemented at the local, with feedback, or to originate at the “leaf nodes” and travel up to inform the mission of the organization. Perhaps both? It’s a matter of distributed and centralized agency and which is paramount, if either.

    Hmmm. I wonder if the 10-statement philosophy functions in the way that Foucault means a statement functions. That’s an interesting idea, especially in that he would interrogate, and, as you say, cut across unities (such as organization hierarchy, individual chapters, etc.). EXCELLENT Foucault quote follows. I think there is a very useful concept in this portion of the quote: “concepts to be structures, and those that, while constituting a strategic choice, leave room for the greatest number of subsequent options” –> How is the 10-statement philosophy OPERATIONALIZED (to use Shelley’s favorite word), how is it expressed (oh, bad breast-feeding pun; that was not intentional, but I’m leaving it), in the local offices, how does that statements, the philosophy that is intangible, become something actual, and structural at the local level. How do the statements allow the greatest flexibility for local offices to meet their particular mothers’ needs, as a demographic entity and as individual mothers. — LOTS HERE.

    Excellent interweaving of Foucault’s discussion of subject within the statement and what you say makes sense (even grammatically in many of the statements, although Foucault says statements do not understand grammatically, but rather relationally). I’m wondering what you mean be “see” in this sentence: It is the activity of the mother, along with her child, that is the subject, and it is only the mother who can see that the true goals of the organization are meet (or at least attempted to be met).” — Determine? Ensure? (is it her interpretation or her actions or both)? Also, since the Foucauldian statement is relational among subjects, I’m wondering if it would be fruitful to apply it not to the mother alone, but to the relationship of mother to child, family to breastfeeding, mother to La Leche; the relationship between mother and child via/through nursing as facilitating by La Leche …. I’m brainstorming here. I’d be interested in further unpacking here.
    I do not know what is meant by “far summit” in this sentence: “The nursing mother, the far summit of the network, comes to the group leader seeking information.” I understand that she is at the end of the network; an end node or leaf node, but not how she is a “summit”.
    This final section: “It is at the local group level that the need for new interpretations or articulations of statements is made evident.” is well done and quite fruitful, I think. This is an excellent explanation for how the new discoveries in the field drive the mission of the organization; local statements create altered or new centralized statements. Is this a feedback loop? Or is there more agency here to define the organization? Who “is” or “creates” the organization? Does the org manage a brand, or do the mothers themselves (in mom to mom communication perhaps) create the brand. Is this complicated by the organization being run by mothers? Does the org communicate to others who are not mothers or do you only join the network upon becoming a mother? Is the end node the mother-child together, not the child? (Looking at your drawing) I know the child benefits from the breastfeeding and is the recipient of the milk, but the mother is the recipient of the information; and, if we accept as you posited and I elaborated above, that the relationship is paramount, then perhaps that final end node describes the ultimate goal of the organization and the mother– successful bonding and nursing experience.

  2. Hi Jenny,
    First, I appreciate your OoS as a nursing mother myself, I have made several calls to my local La Leche League these past six months. It was interesting to think of myself as a node in this network, and how I might be connected to the base of the tree of enunciative derivation.

    I can’t help but think of the 10 statement philosophy as a network in its own right. For example, just thinking of how these statements play out in my own life, where I have altered or adhered to them, where they have been easy or difficult to uphold. Just looking at the idea of when to start feeding a baby and how it should be close to natural form. I started feeding my baby around five months and found she rejected “whole” foods like sweet potato but enjoys the kind of cereal foods made for babies. As I read these statements, I see them as nodes in a network of my experience and my connections to them varied depending on how well I feel I have “lived up to” these standards for nursing. I wonder if there is ground for exploration for you going forward in thinking of how the statements could be nodes at work in the life of the individual mothers and babies in a network?

    I also wonder about where agency lies. I agree that connection to this network is at the initiation of the mother (like when I call the chapter to seek advice), but there is also a strong connection between the hospital and the chapter. When I was in the hospital, the lactation specialist associated with the hospital’s chapter came to visit and offer services. When I call to get advice, the consultant is free to give the direction she sees fit (although she said she was prohibited from advising that I feed prior to six months, which suggests she is bound by those 10 statements – so that might be where much agency lies). Perhaps the control over the network exists in multiple sites simultaneously and with equal weight?

    Not so much of a confusion here, but a suggestion. The visual you created does not seem to show the mother to mother activity, which I imagine is often at the heart of the meetings. Also, these nodes are probably participating in multiple networks, as we all know that new mothers are inundated with advice from friends, family, doctors, pediatricians, books and online information. Perhaps you could look at where your network is situated in the larger field of breastfeeding? That seems to be a particularly Foucauldian ideas as well.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s